About Me - Milton Laene Araujo

My photo
Lake Worth, Florida, United States
My name is Milton and I am a reader. I love to feed my mind with what if’s?, through stories.
Showing posts with label States in the USA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label States in the USA. Show all posts

3/06/13

America and a quick look at its history back then

America has been discovered

When the Spaniards arrived on the American mainland around the years 1500, they were confronted by two major civilizations. One was the Aztec Empire in Mexico with a population of at least 13 million people, and the Inca Empire in Peru with at least half of the Aztec population.  There was also the Maya territory in the Yucatan peninsula.

The Incas formed many different tribes and created a genuine imperial system with a hereditary dynasty of absolute Incas, along with a system similar to aristocratic socialism. All the land was state owned and most workers received food in exchange. Their old age was well taken care off by the system they created.

The Aztec empire, on the other hand, exercised harsh militarism against its people ordering them to pay for their own way with heavy tribute to Tenochtitlan, with food, goods, or textiles. They believed that the earth and the sun was responsible for their existence, and the only way to continue existing would be by performing rituals where human beings would be scarified with their blood to nourish the earth and the sun. During these rituals, they used a “sacrificial knife” and perforated the chest of a human to remove the heart. Due to this ritual, it is explainable why so many people in the valley of Mexico welcomed the Spaniards and became allied with European Invaders in Peru.

Before 1500s, worldwide racial segregation prevailed. The Negroid remained concentrated in sub-Saharan Africa and a few pacific Island; the Mongoloid in Asia and the Americas; the Caucasoid in Europe, North Africa, the Middle East and India; and the Australoid in Australia. After 1500s the pattern had altered all over, but the greatest change occurred in the Americas, where the native population declined dramatically in the century following the first contact with the Europeans.
Although, in America the Aztec and Incas Empire collapsed suddenly around 1521 and 1532 respectively, the European impact around the world remained limited until the 1600s, but grew thereafter. Once it was clear that there was a new world, (around 1521), many great series of voyages were executed by English, French and Dutch navigators, who in search for alternative routes to Asia, reveled another continental land-mass with a continuous coast from the Caribbean to the Artic, and opened the way for the European exploration and settlement of eastern North America.
During this time, Portugal already possessed several archipelagos in the Atlantic and the Gulf of Guinea, some fortresses in Morocco, and a few trading stations in West Africa. In 1498, Portugal sent a caravel to India to trade spices using a new route, ending up in South America, Brazil. At this time, to cease conflicts between Spaniards and Portuguese, a line was used to divide what belonged to Portugal and what belonged to Spain. Brazil, occupying the right side of the line, was territory of Portugal. Few dared to challenge the validity of this treaty of Tordesillas, apparently enhanced by the Union of Portugal and Spain in 1580.
The Conquest of Mexico by Hernan Cortez from 1519 to 1521 and Peru by Francisco Pizarro in 1531 laid the foundation of a huge Spanish Colonial Empire in the Americas. By 1535, when the Spanish Crown had established a vice regal government in Mexico and Lima became the Capital of Peru, all the major centers of indigenous population in the former Aztec and Inca empire lay in Spanish hands. The area of both new empires combined was at least four times the size of Spain, and it had a population seven times higher. The richness in Mexico Aztec and Inca Peru was enough to keep the Spaniards in one place, but greed made the crown to order them to conquer new territories and establish interim government all over. This way Spain was advancing with new viceroyalties in New Granada in 1739 and Rio de La Plata in 1776 and new military government in Texas in 1718 and California in 1767.  These new advances did not generate money, for it was mostly inhabited, but it demonstrated the power of Spain.
In Peru, a city called Potosi, and in Mexico a city called Zacatecas became the largest producers of silver in the world, and by 1560 silver was the most important export to Europe.
In other parts of the continent colonization was slower. The Portuguese only settled the Atlantic coast of South America after 1549 for fear that the French might do so. By 1600s the coast of Brazil had become filled with profitable sugar plantations and mills while the center of Brazil was inhabited by natives. Brazil imported labor from Africa, taking at least 40% of all slaves that left that continent. Only by 1690 Portugal decided to expand its territory and take what was left from the natives, while discovering that in the interior of the land there were enormous gold deposits, hence, the population moved to the center of the country and a new wave of colonization took place.
Meanwhile, in North America an abundance of European Settlements were taking place. Looking at a map from South to North following the East coast, the English claimed Jamestown in 1607, Annapolis in 1708, Philadelphia in 1682, New York in 1626 to 1664, the Capital of Rode Island Colony in 1636, Plymouth in 1620, Bay Colony in 1630, Portsmouth in 1653, Penobscot in 1628, etc…
The Atlantic seaboard of North America at first attracted few Europeans who came mostly for fishing and fur, due to the bad climate and poor soil. The settlement truly began with the foundation of Arcadia (Nova Scotia) by the French. Then, it speeded into Virginia and Massachusetts Bay by the English and of New Amsterdam (later New York) by the Dutch, and gradually the European pressed mainland.
The French Advanced down the St Lawrence and by 1662 the Mississippi, creating a chain of fortified post all the way to the Gulf of Mexico and founding New Orleans in 1718. The English spread out around the rich fur hunting grounds of Hudson Bay.
During this period, all wars among the European states involved Americas, with England gaining first the Dutch colonies along the Hudson (1664) and then French Canada in 1763.
By 1700s many Europeans lived in North America, but by 1820 the population soared to at least 8 million people, compared with just half of that of Spanish American.
The Spaniards in America relied at first on Indian labor (the word Indian must be the result of a trip supposedly to India, that in return gave the discovery of the new land, and the inhabitants were, therefore called Indians).  They worked in ranching and mining, and very soon a mestizo population was emerging especially in Mexico and Peru. The British, however, who wanted land for plantations, exterminated the natives in sight. At this time the Spanish Colonies had at least 7 million Indians compared to less than half a million on the British Colonies.
In Virginia and later the Carolinas, tobacco was introduced as a cash crop, and a viable solution was to import labor from Africa, as the Portuguese have been doing in Brazil. By 1820 at least 2 million Africans lived in North America compared to half a million in Spanish America. 
During this period each mother country kept close eyes in their colonies. The colonists were satisfied at first because they felt secure from natives uprising. Britain’s victory over France in 1763 however, encourage the elites soon come to resent the continuing tax demands to pay for something the mother nation was involved. In 1776 they demanded their independence and the colonies of Latin America followed suit after 1808.
Napoleon invasion of Spain and Portugal in 1808 enabled these countries’ American Colonies to gain independence.
The revolt begun in Argentina in 1810 and in Venezuela in 1811, helped by the decision of Great Britain and the United States to oppose intervention, Spain felt helpless and lost total control over South America. In the north, early rebellions in Mexico were suppressed, but in 1823 a Republic was proclaimed, and a last Spanish attempt at reconquest in 1829 met with defeat.
Brazil, on the other hand, made its transition peacefully. Portugal’s King sent his son to rein Brazil in 1822 along with a new constitution. His name was Don Pedro I. His power lasted until 1889 when Brazil replaced the empire with a Federal Republic.
Independency was nothing more than a political movement confined to the colonial aristocracy, who desired a transfer of authority without social change.
Latin America, at least half a century after independency was dominated by military dictators who ruled in the interests of the privileged classes and squandered their assets on repeated territorial disputes. Mexico lost most, forfeiting vast territories to the United States; but it was also the first state to introduce social reforms after the election of the Indian Benito Juarez as President in 1861.

Someone to Remember…
Simon Bolivar became known as the liberator for his role in the emancipation of South America from Spanish rule. After Participating in several unsuccessful revolts, he and his army defeated the Spanish at Boyaca in 1819 and organized the Republic of Gran Colombia. In 1821, he defeated the Spanish near Carabobo, ensuring Venezuelan independence. Between 1822 and 1824 he also helped free Ecuador and Peru. Southern Peru became a new republic, named Bolivia in his honor.

In Summary, in 1783 American independency is officially recognized, and in 1803 America purchases Louisiana from France for 25 million Dollars. In 1820 Missouri compromise bans slavery north of 36 degrees. In 1845 Texas in annexed to the U.S. In 1846 Oregon was acquired. In 1848 we have the Mexican cession. In 1854 we have the Kansas-Nebraska Act. In 1860 Abraham Lincoln is elected to the presidency. In 1861 Civil war begins. In 1863 we have the emancipation of the slaves, and in April 26 1865 the South surrenders and reconstruction begins.   
Napoleon Invasion of Portugal and Spain in 1808 stimulates independence movements in Latin America. The battle of Boyaca in 1819 leads to the independence of Colombia. Battle of Carabobo in 1821 finally secures Venezuelan independence. Brazil Declares Independence in 1822. Mexican Republic declared in 1823. In 1879 there is a war of the Pacific (Chile, Bolivia, and Peru). 1910 start of Mexican Revolution. 

Milton Laene Araujo

7/22/12

The Massacre in Aurora, Colorado - Milton Laene Ar...

Get a grip of yourself - by Milton L. Araujo: The Massacre in Aurora, Colorado - Milton Laene Ar...: The Massacre in Aurora , Colorado -   And the guy who did it. – Colorado – July 2012 It is so sad what took place! It is even sadder...

The Massacre in Aurora, Colorado - Milton Laene Araujo

The Massacre in Aurora, Colorado -  And the guy who did it. – Colorado – July 2012

It is so sad what took place! It is even sadder for family members. Their lives have changed. My thoughts and my prayers go to all of them.

The first thought that comes to mind is whether the criminal has the capacity to recognize feelings that are being experienced by another sentient or semi-sentient (in fiction writing) being. Someone may need to have a certain amount of empathy before they are able to feel compassion.

One reality is: We pay way too much attention to criminal minds. We portray them on TV as something we need to learn to recognize. No! We do not need to recognize them. This is the job of a therapist, a psychologist, a pshychiatrist – Not for the media to make them celebrities. The media has the obligation to talk about the human being who departed, what their lives were like, and what they shared while in this sphere. Where they loved? Who loved them? What did they have in special to those who loved? This is what we need to concentrate on. I want to know the name of the victims

Another reality: The criminal mind should to be called joe doer. His picture should be changed into a one face - The same to all joe doers  - So we do not see a face on TV. He, or she will be judged, and family members of the victims know where he is. No need to make him a Mystery.  

Human beings are capable of anythig to get attention. Some people go the the extreme. There is no explanation to why human beings lose their empathy at times. Some people love drama! They live for it. Others like to show off. Attention deficit, is nothing more than lack of attention. We all suffer from lack of attention – But we do not go to the extreme of destroying a life. We go away! We divorce, we separate, we resolve matters. We are humans, for cries out loud.

One way or another, something went awire in the head of this Joe Doer, that he decided to terrorize an entire nation. For this particular reason, he needs to be treated as a Joe Doer. No more TV shows about him. Nothing. We can learn about it by doing a search in the net.

No more notoriety to the criminal – And only to the victims. Let’s treat any criminal as a person with no name, and a comon face. This will teach them that it ends right there!

In summary, what happened is a barbarity. It is something that must be kept off the TV waves. Prisoners have no acces to the internet. So, they do not have to watch shows that make them a notoriety.

Some changes are nacessary!

Milton Laene Araujo – July 22, 2012




5/09/12

USA weird "Place Names"

When talking about weird USA place names

Ecru is the colour of unbleached linen
But it is also, a city in Mississippi.

Accident is an unexpected and undesirable event
But is also, a city in Maryland

Cool and Arcade are both in California
While Acres, Buttermilk, and Chalk are in Kansas

Early travelling in Diagonal I saw myself in Indiana
Had Bacon Hill in New York, and made a Deposit in Deposit NY before I left.

Spent Christmas, in Christmas, Florida
But had a best time in Alliance, North Carolina

Went to Agency in Missouri and bought Concrete in North Dakota.
In Chili Indiana I heard about an Avalanche in Wisconsin

Things went down in Cameo, West Virginia.

Now, when talking about Action names
Divide is in Montana while Hustle is in Virginia

Page in Arizona Parade in South Dakota
Startup in Washington and Stow in Massachusetts.

Check Virginia and Cook in Georgia.
Telegraph in Texas and Transfer in Pennsylvania.

To build my Sweet Home in Oregon I got USA products
Alcove in New York, Wall in North Dakota, Telephone in Texas.
Pool in West Virginia, Pillow from Pennsylvania and a Piano and Nursery from Texas.

Also from Pennsylvania:  Manor, Library, and the Lawn
Cabinet from Idaho and Heaters from West Virginia.

Happy Camp and Confidence lies in California
But the Bliss is in Idaho.
I Carefree in Arizona and become a Unity in Maine.

I Nevesink in New York and my Apex is in New York
Bravo Michigan and Acme Wisconsin.

Champion Nebraska joined the Jollyville in Oklahoma.

After Travelling around the World, I came back to America
to find out that the whole world is here

We have...Canada in Kentucky, China in Maine
Warsaw in North Carolina and Venus in Florida
Venice in Los Angeles and Trinidad in Colorado

Our Paris and our Syria is in Virginia and our Riviera is in Texas.
Mexico and Rome fit inside New York while London takes over Ohio.

Cuba in Illinois and Denmark in Oregon
Dover in Delaware and Geneva in Alabama.

Holland in Michigan and Ireland in West Virginia
Lima is in Montana while Mars is in Pennsylvania.

Moscou is in Tennessee and Scotland is in Connecticut
But Malta is in Idaho.


Milton L Araujo


3/28/12

How to educate a child to become a responsible Teen




Children need discipline, and it must come from parents.

According to  the U.S. Census Bureau in November, 2009, there are approximately 13.7 million single parents in the United States today, and those parents are responsible for raising 21.8 million children (approximately 26% of children under 21 in the U.S. today). It means that 26% of our population will experience life with only one parent, or multiple parents/guardians, such as extended families etc. Either way, it is different from the real expectation of one child with a set of parents to take care of that child.

Most single parents engage in dating games, and the message passed to a child  is that a new person will take the place of a parent. It can get very confusing, specially when grown ups make babies and can not get along to raise them. It become reality to a child that he or she is in fault.

The remaining 74% of children under 21 in the U.S are being raised by a set of parents. Whether this set of parents are the natural parents it is not clear, but with a divorce rate of about 50%, it is fair to say that a large number of children are being raised with one step-parent, and some step-siblings as well.

Again, the message passed to a child is that grown ups can not keep a promise or engage in long term commitment. 

Those, whether single parents or married couples, who end up with the responsibility to raise a child is in charge of cleansing that child's mind of all negativeness from the past.

Parents Do not!
1- Fight in front of the kids
2- Use foul language to express fury in front of the kids
3- Involve kids into your fights

Parents have at least one luggage filled with nonsense they have inherited before they become parents. It is up to each individual to let that luggage interfere with their present. Nonsense is what you get when you are a child and presence your parents fighting, using foul language towards one another, or fight because of something related with timing and activities involving the children.

If you are a parent and if you committed the 3 do not mentioned above, chances are you came from a family that did not obey it either. Your nonsense is spreading and it will never stop. You were somehow a difficult teen who got away with things, and now as a parent you see things differently.

It is your fault! You can blame your parents if you want, but it is your fault because you have children now. If they do not obey your rules, it is because you let them get away before. Your sense of discipline was way out of order. You did not set the rules when your teen was a child, and now it is uncontrollable. He or she will face difficulties on their own. If they are not already in trouble.

It is too late to start setting "the rules of the house". You lost this battle. If you have a teen who is out of control,

Parents Do not!
1- Confront them with new rules
2- Invade their privacy
3- Reason with your teen. He will not hear you.

Parents Do this:
1- Cut part of the allowance. If there was none, give some money for expenses.
2- Encourage some of his friends to come over.
3- Try to be at the same age and get involved with activities.

Do not serve alcohol to minors and do not allow it in your house. If it comes to that, call the police. Do not hit your teen, for you will go to jail. Have lots of food available when friends come over, so they will spend more time at your place, and less time doing something wrong. Be creative and allow them to bring their computer to play games in teams. Have hot dogs and hamburgers for them all. Try to get inside your child's head as a mentor, and not as a pal. When ready, ask for forgiveness for committing the 3 don'ts for parents by doing things that would affect your child's life. Maybe this could change into something better, but do not hold too much expectation. Be sincere, for you had fights while your child was in the back sit of the car. You said nasty things to one another inside the house. You involved your child in some dispute.

You still can win this entire combat. You will make your child a good parent, considering that you THINK you failed in your endeavor. Be honest and take the blames specifically, to help your child to cleanse his mind of negative thoughts. Take the blame for everything and everyone, including your parents because they did not know any better. As long as you take the blame, you can then ask your teen to put a stop in this cycle of fights that affects everyone.

Teach him to respect his partner and treat everyone as co-workers. If we all learn to treat everyone as co-workers we would be happier. Work as a team with your partner - not against him.

If you have a child less than 5, you can not tolerate this child be out of control. Discipline need to be reinforced at this age, and zero tolerance for wrong doings. Rules must be direct. Time to go to bed, time to get up, shower, eat, play, etc. Time for fun with parents is necessary. Do not mix rules - it creates confusion.

Watch Super Nanny to get an idea how to discipline yourself and your child.

LEARN TO SPREAD THESE RULES:

Parents Do not!
1- Fight in front of the kids
2- Use foul language to express fury in front of the kids
3- Involve kids into your fights

If you would like to send a direct comment, please do so to
Milton@ibt-eft.com


10/16/11

President's Emergency Powers by Milton

The Constitutional views of the president’s emergency powers have brought “erosions” into civil liberties, but the formal powers of the executive provided by article II are without substance if the president is unable to persuade the major constituencies in and beyond the government that their interest are mutual.
This discussion of executive power involves one central question: To what extent is the president authorized to act on behalf of national interest in times of foreign and domestic emergencies in absence of law, or in defiance of law? If we consider presidential actions in time of crisis from the earliest days, President Washington considered a constitutional prerogative of his office to quell domestic insurrection by using force, if necessary, against Indian tribes. Thomas Jefferson stretched the outer boundaries of his office to his successful campaign to purchase Louisiana from France in 1803. Several presidents in the nineteen-century, engaged American troops to fight the so-called quasi-wars, to secure American commercial interests. Lincoln’s’ broad and bold use of executive power defended the prerogative of the executive to go beyond what either the court or congress had recognized as the written law governing the president’s roll as commander in chief. Then again, no president had been faced with an internal crisis that was remotely comparable to the civil war. Thus it was no surprise that the court was soon called upon to decide whether Lincoln’s invocation of executive power to conduct and manage the Civil War violated the Constitution. The Court in Prize Cases (1963) was presented with the question of whether President Lincoln’s command to impose a naval blockade of Southern Ports usurped the power of congress to declare war. The court provided Lincoln with his constitutional foundation to conduct his aggressive prosecution of the Civil War. Later, the Court made clear that Presidential power to suspend constitutional rights of civilians and exercise executive prerogative, not extended beyond wartime emergencies. By the time U.S entered into World War II, the court had given President Roosevelt fully and complete power to impose emergency domestic measures in the service of National security interests, whether economical or political in nature, regardless of their impact on the civil liberties of the United States Citizens. As an exercise in raw executive power, in 1942 President Roosevelt decided to order the evacuation of Japanese Americans from the West Coast and intern them indefinitely into makeshift prison camps. In Korematsu V. U.S (1944) the court upheld President Roosevelt’s evacuation and internment as valid exercise of wartime powers.  In 1977, during the Vietnam War, The United States brought actions to enjoin publication in the New York Times and in the Washington Post of certain classified material, had not met the “heavy” burden of showing justification for the enforcement of such a prior restraint. The Case New York Times Co. v. U.S (1971), the president’s emergency power violated the First Amendment. In 1979 Iranians invaded the American Embassy in Iran and took a few diplomats hostages. President Carter froze all Iranian Assets in the United States. The case Dames & Moore V. Reagan (1981) illustrates how intertwined domestic and foreign interests can be in the exercise of emergency presidential Power.  Undoubtedly, it is the fear and fervor surrounding emergency times that allow imposition of laws that infringe civil liberties. But once a judicial opinion rationalizes such an order to show that it conforms to the Constitution, or rather rationalizes the Constitution to show that the Constitution sanctions such an order, the Court for all time has validated the principal of racial discrimination in criminal procedures and of transplanting American Citizens. This principle lies like a loaded weapon ready for the hand of any authority that can bring forward a plausible claim of an urgent need.

10/09/11

Texting and killing - Teen issues 2011 - by Milton Laene Araujo

The Internet was commercialized  in the 1990s and became an international network due to its popularization and its incorporation into virtually every aspect of modern human life. Coincidentally, at the same time cell phones emerged. Instant messaging became popular and so did texting, which refers to the exchange of brief written text messages between fixed-line phone or mobile phone and fixed or portable devices over a network.

Teens are text messaging at least forty times per day. Today, text messaging has been extended to include messages containing image, video, and sound content, therefore becoming a lethal weapon, and a necessary evil. Defamation, also known as libel is the communication of a written statement that makes a claim, expressly stated or implied to be factual, that may give an individual a negative image. Teens are sharing innuendos and defamation on twitter, also, sharing pictures of themselves nude, event worse, videos or anything of self risk.

Teenagers retaliate to groundless criticism with more vehemency.

Just recently, a teenager boy, 18 was arrested for making threats to his girlfriend via texting. After being bailed out of jail, he went back to his high school and killed his girlfriend, 17.

It has become common for teens to " text their anger away"  to whom and where they may. This is not only a teen problem, for it also includes parents of teens who are not up to date with technology, and parents and teens who experience the same technology advance. When parents lack Internet knowledge, teens are free to do whatever they want. When parents are aware of technology, both parents and children get wrapped up into all novelties of technology.

We are living in a society of selfishness. Families are broken and the lack of togetherness has battered the population.

Teens are learning everything virtually.

Internet laws are still trying to mature and gain shape. Whenever we are focusing on one hand-held device, and writing with the other hand, we are ready to ventilate.

 Both parents and teens are NOT in fault today but both need the same schooling, however, this school is in transition, or cannot keep up with technology. Schools of disciplining, and good manners is available online, but doesn't fit with with this change we are about to face.

In the near future schools - or a building for students to meet - will be available, but all classes will be virtual, therefore many will choose to take classes at home. More room for texting -.  Classes will be pre-recorded, and teaching will become a marketing for the fit.

How does one know the damages a text message can cause to another human being? Kids can be very cruel at times. Texting is a weapon that should be used to share information, and NOT to ventilate agony. But teens do it. People use texting to ventilate - or to promote themselves, like celebrities who text and share their whereabouts. This is a tool for a stalker. Yet, celebrities always want to share where they are, what they ate, etc. This is bad. People in general, (This year 2011), share via twitter wherever they are doing - I checked on the word bath just to check what was happening, and most of the people said that they were going to take a bath and go to wherever they were going. This is crazy, for any stalker or killer simply need to follow your messages...
Another teen caused brain damage to a classmate after she texted something related to his brother's suicide. He reacted to his emotions, and did not think.  Like texting - no need to think - whatever comes to mind can go there now!

When we refer to High Schools, they need a cell-phone tower as part of their building. This way any call will be connected with this same tower and communication will be controlled and semi-restricted.

Be careful if you are a teenager. Do not send "hating" text messages, for it can be the only thing the other person may have from you. Written word is immortal, and when used to defame, it can be hard and costly to repair. Be careful if you are a parent. Anything posted in any social media will stay there, and when one human being is exposed by others in a negative manner to the entire world, it is something we have no idea how disturbing can be. In this texting era, where grammar lost its power, and words became a gizmo of letters or abbreviations, is hard to let go off the past, It is hard to embrace an era where words get distorted, and start to live today.

Now we are collecting the fruit of what we planted in our society. It is an almost lost harvest. We can prepare for the next harvest by teaching moral examples to our kids and the truthfulness in the sentence " Treat others as you would like to be treated". Do not text hate messages. to anyone .

Milton Laene Araujo
Milton@ibt-eft.com




9/19/11

Gay Marriage and a viable solution link

Gays Issues – Gay Marriage by Milton Laene Araujo

Marriage is a union between a male and a female. This union consists of whatever cultural, legal, religious or even social, economical and emotional reasons they decided to get married.

Should two people of the same sex get married? No!  It distorts the meaning of the word marriage, or creates another meaning, to accommodate a social relationship. Marriage should not be used to describe anything other than a commitment between a man and a woman, and such a union, often formalized via a wedding ceremony, may also be called matrimony.

The issue here is whether two people that share a space for a determined time of years have the right to be taxed like any married individual today, and receive equal benefits. Differently from slavery, racism, or women suffrage, gay marriage has been stretched out of proportion by being compared in a religious sense only, and ignoring what contrasts to it.

Gay people should not get married, but seek for a law that recognises the right of living with a partner and within duo process, the right to adopt and create a family.  Gay people may celebrate their union. But must refrain from the word marriage, for it involves religious beliefs and creates fury for those that vehemently oppose to it.  

It is a political issue, for it involves how to distribute the monies received, and it must be decided without any participation or involvement of religion.

A candidate to public service must recognize that a law needs to be created allowing roommates to have a brake in taxes, and enjoy whatever perks any married couple have. It doesn’t have to have a name, for it is simply a right - It may be called Union of Peers.

In this world of relativity, where one thing depends on another, people need to relate to another to grow spiritually. A union of two people must be recognised and insurance, health benefits, etc should be shared with any other human being.

It is a simple math. Considering that 50% of all marriages end with divorce, why a group of individuals with different sexual orientation, would want to get involved in something that brings nothing but law suits? Union of Peers should be simpler, and require the same address. 

Due to the distortion of the word marriage, and how it has been impregnated into individuals' mind, it is common to see on TV reality shows with gays getting into matrimony. Yes, it is disturbing to any form of faith and religious belief that most people follow. This is what has been played into people’s mind in relation to a “right to support other” agreement, which should exist: Union of Peers.

Therefore, the topic gay marriage should not be an issue. We need to have the right to pass our insurance to a friend or a roommate, or anyone to whom you decide to share, without affecting any premium. All individual policies would not exist anymore. We live in a world of relativity where we need a point A to refer ourselves to point B. We need to relate with others, to know whom and where we are. I oppose gay marriage because it is a mockery to the origin and conservation of the sacrament of marriage. I am in favor of a law recognising Union of Peers with less complication. Something more temporary. Open to all. Now, if you want the nutty gritty of this subject, visit this essay. http://www.bidstrup.com/marriage.htm

UPDATE - March 27, 2013 -

After I finished reading the link above, and doing some some soul search, I changed my mind in relation to gay marriage. I think that gay people should get married because it is a right. I take back all my idea of creating side steps for something that is imminent. People have the right to be free from religion, therefore, there is no arguable dissent to this topic. My post was written in 2009, and it was my idea then. I feel bad for my parents to presence something that they are not ready to face due to their religious belief. I feel bad for everyone who is offended at first for this law, that until now, has not been approved by the courts, but it will be approved, no matter what happens. But if we take a look at History, all changes related to civil rights occurred after great turmoil. I imagine now how difficult it was when a decision to free slaves, or to end segregation came about. Liberty and equality is happening, and only after it is settled that we would see that it makes sense. My heart goes to everyone who will be saddened by this occurrence, but they should not take it personal, unless they want to get married. I have been a racist against my own class because I used my emotions and my feelings that I inherited somehow. I have used bigotry, and I regret for being this way.

Creating laws to accommodate groups is the same as segregation, therefore it can not exist (I am referring to the creation of a Union of peers mentioned before). As you can see, our mind changes and we grow!

Milton




  
Milton

2/07/11

Irreconciliable differences

Irreconcilable differences


I have never heard anything as vulgar as this term: Irreconcilable differences, which is used in all divorce papers.
For me it is nothing more than lack of acceptance.
How can you say that you love another human being when you are not capable of accepting him or her the way they are?
A man has 1000 pieces, and every piece is a person! A person he met, a person he liked, a person he did not like, and so forth and so on. When two people decide to commit, they need to be open for changes.

Luca got married to Sandra, and they had 3 children. Later Luca got involved with drugs and made life a living hell for his family. Sandra left Luca. She got custody of her children. Luca pays alimony. Both are unhappy. Both have jumped from one marriage to another, and both are divorced again, and again.
The children are a mess. They think they are the reason for the divorce, which most of the cases, it is true. Although, most parents swear that their children have nothing to do with their separation, unfortunately, it is not the truth. Sandra is in search of the right man, but now, with 3 kids, she feels impotent. Luca has been in and out of jail. Money gets tight. Sandra takes Luca to court for late alimony. A battle has begun and will last forever. No one will be happy – EVER.

No one is perfect! Can you get it!???

Everyone lies about something! Everyone commits errors, everyone has a luggage filled with 1000 pieces.
Only when we decide to grow spiritually with another human being, all pieces can be unfolded, and all imperfection turns into a learning process.

Life is a learning process, and we can not leave in the middle of the class. We must to be there, and try to understand why things are they way they are.
Yes, people are different, and I am not saying that you have to take it all alone. But with love and understanding you can turn things around.
Luca for example, got into drugs, cheated and lied to Sandra about everything. Luca spent all the money he had earned, and needed more to feed his habit, or addiction. Sandra got fed up!

Wait a minute!

When did it happen? Why did it happen? Who was involved?
Love doesn't mean to go away! Love mans to look for a solution. Love means to stay there and accept what is going on. It could be you! How would you want things to be if you were Luca?

When (referring here to a woman) we make children with a man, we have a link that can not be separated. It doesn't matter how hard it is, it can be mended. Even if you are hurt in the process, look for help elsewhere. Go back to your family and open the book. Tell the truth to your children. Tell the facts. Tell what you saw and what you have heard, and also tell your children that you are lost.

Do not put them aside. Do not use the idea of protecting them. It will backfire. They will grow up, and learn the truth.

So, before you decide about irreconcilable differences take a look at yourself and find what is better for your kids. Do not use your own judgment. Share with them and discover what is better for that moment, but remember that you are not alone to decide it. Use family members, and try to be understanding that people are not perfect.

There are three types of people: Low class people talk about people. Median class people talk about things, and High class people talk about ideas. These are the types, and they infer in our capacity to give and receive love. The full array of human emotions are rarely involved when people talk about people.

If you truly do not care, go ahead and get it over with! You have not loved anyone. You thought you loved a thing, or an idea of a person, but in reality, you were in love with your life style, and the idea of being in love. You are a median type of people, and things are not only things.

All aspects of the past must remain in the past, and a learning process of acceptance must take place. Accept your mistakes, as one accepts mishaps, and learn from them. Learn to love what is imperfect. Open the line of communication now. A divorce is a battle where the only winner are the lawyers.

This is how it ends.



Milton

7/08/10

role of the supreme court as interpreter of the constitution

1- Discuss the role of the Supreme Court as interpreter of the Constitution, as seen in Merbury V. Madison, Martin V. Hunter Lessee, Cooper V. Aaron, and City of Boerne V. Flores. The Supreme Court’s involvement in the intricacies of the social, political, and economic forces that shapes the lives of American citizens and their institutions can be traced to its assertion and use of judicial review, or the power to decide whether federal, state, and local laws violate the Constitution. Although the Court has no affirmative power to initiate legal action, it has encouraged a more litigious society through its willingness to accept and decide cases that raise questions once thought to be private or political in nature. Judicial review enables the Court, in a single judicial stroke, to replace the customs, approaches, and rules of various regions, states, and localities with national constitutional standards. As we have reviewed many Supreme Court cases in our Constitutional Law class with Professor Brannon, one would think that the Court strikes down federal, state, and local laws with great regularity. Quite the opposite is, in fact, the case. Since the Court, in Marbury v. Madison (1803), first declared an act of Congress unconstitutional, the Court has upheld federal, state, and local laws against constitutional challenges much more often that it has not. Judicial review as a component of judicial Power is not mentioned in the Constitution. Ample evidence exists that the Framers intended the courts to have some sort of power to control the unconstitutional excess of majority rule. Although, judicial review can be seen as a profoundly anti-democratic exercise because the courts are not bound to the electorate, they have proved, in a majority of the cases that judges are not dominating the government, but walking right along with it. Judicial review, while the most potent instrument of judicial power, is not the sole element that defines the constitutional responsibilities of the federal courts. In Calling the Judicial Power of the United States to be vested in one Supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as Congress may from time to time ordain and establish, the Framers handed victories to both, federalists and ant-federalists. The consensus of the delegates was that one appellate court positioned at the pinnacle of the nation’s judicial system was essential to ensure uniformity among the various federal and state courts. The First Congress made passage of the Judiciary Act of 1879 among its highest legislative priorities, and created a multi-tiered federal system of lower district and circuit courts, spelled out in even greater detail the original and appellate jurisdiction of the federal courts described in article III, and authorized the Supreme Court to hear appeals from these courts and also appeals from state supreme courts if the claims involved federal constitutional questions and cases that involved challenges to federal constitutional law. Section 25 permitted the Supreme Court to hear cases appeal from state supreme courts when such courts 1-declared a federal law treaty unconstitutional, 2- ruled against an assertion of federal constitutional claim of right or privilege, or 3- upheld a state law that had been challenged as unconstitutional or illegal under the law of the U.S. The law, however, said nothing in Section 25 or anywhere else about the power of the federal courts to review congressional laws or executive actions. The power of the federal courts to review federal laws, long assumed as implicit to the exercise of judicial power, was assumed by the Court, after more than a decade of silence, in Marbury v. Madison. After two centuries after John Marshall explained and defended judicial review on behalf of a unanimous Supreme Court in Marbury v. Madison, scholars continue to debate the power that this landmark decision gave the Court to declare unconstitutional laws enacted by the political branches. The Supreme Court, despite its professed concern for judicial independence, had to impose self-restraint on its power to exercise judicial review, which concludes that the “courts as well as other departments, are bound” by the requirements of the Constitution. Marbury was used as an instrument through which to achieve equality rather than supremacy for the Court in the American constitutional system. It established the legitimacy of the Court in the American Constitutional system. The Supreme Court role as an interpreter of the constitution on the case Marbury v. Madison decided that it has the power to review acts of the congress and declare them unconstitutional. The case is set forth when Marbury, appointed Justice of peace by outgoing President Adams, did not have his signed and sealed position delivered. Although Marbury has a right to his commission, and the appropriate remedy is a writ of mandamus, congress doesn’t have the power, under the constitution, to give the Supreme Court additional original jurisdiction. The original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is defined by the constitution and cannot be enlarged by the congress. As mentioned before, Section 25 of the Judiciary Act gives the Supreme Court appellate jurisdiction in such cases. Is section 25 constitutional? Text of Article III Section 2, Paragraph 1: - The Judicial Power shall extend to all cases in law and Equity arising under this constitution; and Section2, Paragraph 2: - In all the other cases before mentioned, the Supreme Court shall have appellate jurisdiction, both as to law and fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make. In the case Martin v. Hunter’s Lessee (1816), the Supreme Court gains ground by showing its capability of reviewing and potentially set aside decisions of State courts on questions of federal law. Judicial Supremacy takes a turn when the Court, in Cooper V. Aaron (1958), announced “the basic principle that the federal judiciary is supreme in the exposition of the law of the Constitution” and that the court is the final, supreme expositor of the Constitution –into one inseparable package. (Ivers-60). In this case the Supreme Court cited the fourteenth Amendment and the Brown v. Board of Education to bind the ruling, making it clear that Legislatures are not allowed to nullify Court Judgments. On City of Boerne v. Flores (1997), Congress exceeds its enforcement power under section 5 of the fourteenth Amendment by enactment of the Religion Freedom Restoration Act. It is the duty of the Supreme Court to interpret the meaning of the constitution. Congress exceeds its authority when it attempts to override such an interpretation by statute. The Court considers congress’s power “of inquiry-with process to enforce it- [as] an essential and auxiliary to the legislative function” and thus implied by the very nature of the legislature’s role in separation of powers.